child evidence and it's admissibility in Nigeria


Price: 4000 Naira (BSC, MSC)


p style=”text-align: justify”>
Determination of lawsuits is highly dependent on these availability of evidence. In law, every person is a competent witness in any judicial proceeding unless otherwise prevented by the law. And every compellable witness is a competent witness as the court will not compel anyone to give evidence, if he is incompetent to do so.
However, it is not every competent witness that is compellable in court. Competence does not imply ‘reliable,’ thus a witness may legally speaking not be able to give evidence for several reasons. For example, the witness may be a child who is too young that he/she cannot understand the questions put to him or give rational answers to them. Compellability on the other hands deals with the question whether as a matter of law, witnesses can be obliged to give evidence when they do not wish to do so but there are some circumstances in which competent witnesses cannot be obliged to give evidence against their will. This long essay therefore aims at analyzing the competency and compellability of a child to give evidence as a witness with respect to how it affects availability and admissibility of evidence.
Chapter one of the long essay which is introductory explains the objectives, focus, extent and limitation of the study as well as the methodology employed in carrying out the research. Chapter two gives an insight as to the elements of the topic by explaining what Competency and Compellability of a witness imply. In chapter three the long essay considers who a child is in law and the conditions for the admissibility of his testimonies. While chapter four sheds light on issues relating to compellability of a child witness and the effect of compelling an incompetent child witness. Lastly, chapter five summarizes the findings of the research and made far reaching recommendations were offered as a forward It is strongly believed that if recommendations made herein are taken seriously and reflected in proposed amendment to the Act, the would go along way in improving the state of the law in that direction.



Issues relating to competence and compellability of child evidence in Nigerian law of evidence are though becoming a recurrence and popular with the availability of case laws and statutes regulating the subject matter, yet it is not out of point to assert that it has not received its deserved attention.
However, the law of Evidence remains the channel for proper regulation of the legal process. And evidence has been defined as:
Any specie of proof or probative matters legally presented at the trial of an issue, by the act of the parties and through the medium of witness records, documents, exhibits, concrete objects for the purpose of inducing belief in the mind of the court or judiciary as to their contention.
At Common Law, it is not all evidence given in court that may be held admissible, for instance before a child can give evidence which will be admitted, such child must be and compellable witness. Therefore, a proper attention will be given to the definition and meaning of competence and compellability, its nature and principles and the position it occupies in the law of evidence.
Also worthy of addressing is who child is in law? And the conditions which such child must satisfy before he becomes a competent and compellable witness. Importantly, as giving of evidence by a child may have some negative effects, it has been advocated that there should be a systemized way of receiving a child’s evidence with proper consideration of the situation of the child and determination of whether the child is induced by a third party.
Also, attention will be paid to the effect of giving evidence in court and why most children may feel reluctant to give evidence in court as well as the issues risk of hysterical invention, childish imagination and collisions which may be inherent in the evidence of a child in Nigerian courts.
This long essay focuses on competency and compellability of a child to give evidence before Nigerian courts. The meaning, general principles, importance, provisions of the Evidence Act as well as the exceptions to the general rule in Section 155(1) of the Evidence Act would be examined.The essay would also explain who a child is in law, the testimony of such a child in civil and criminal proceedings as well as the conditions for the admissibility of such evidence. More importantly, the long essay examines the effects and defects of wrongfully admitting evidence by a child in court.
The main reason for venturing into the subject mater of this long essay is to bring out and explain the procedure and practices of the Nigerian courts in relation to the admissibility of child evidence as well as the importance and nature of competence and compellability as in relation to child.
The long essay would also appraise and analyze the role of and what should be the role of the courts in ensuring that the evidence of a child is credible enough to be admitted and the conditions. It is hoped that the reader of the long essay would on careful perusal of the essay appreciate the competence of a child in law.
This long essay explains competency and compellability as regards child evidence and examines the conditions which a child must satisfy before he or she becomes a competent and/or compellable witness in courts of law. The essay focuses mainly on the relevant approaches of the courts as it relates to the competency and compellability of a child and the methods to be adopted.
This long essay is writing basically within the ambit of its title. Chapter one is on the general introduction which includes background of the study, objectives of the study, focus of study, scope of study, research methodology adopted, and review of related literatures as well as definition of terms having peculiar meaning. Chapter two dwells on the definitions and principles relating to competence and compellability, the provisions of the Evidence Act thereon and the exceptions to the general rule.
Chapter three explains the evidence of a child, who child is in law and the conditions for the admissibility of his evidence. Chapter four deals with the implication of uncorroborated evidence of a child, effects of wrongful admission or rejection of a child evidence, the importance of competence and compellability and the negative effects of our court process on the child witness while chapter five dwells on the conclusion and recommendations to strengthen competency and compellability of child evidence before the Nigerian courts.
This essay is basically library based. The method adopted for the study is descriptive analysis and general appraisal. And for a thorough exposition of the subject of the work the essay would source its materials from both primary and secondary sources of law.
The primary sources include basically the Evidence Act (now Cap. E14
LFN, 2004), Children and Young Persons Act Cap C4 LFN, 2004, Criminal Procedure Act Cap. C 41 LFN, 2004 and Case laws. The secondary sources include textbooks both foreign and local textbooks, journal articles and lecture notes on evidence.
The fact that this area of the law is not new can not be denied as there are sufficiently available texts and learned journals articles in which opinions have been expressed on almost every aspect of the law in this area in Nigeria. It is not however, being suggested that this long essay would be copying the works of others in to this long essay, but to find a strong foundation for the present presentations and to examine earlier opinions. After all, precedents thrive well in law. And more so, it is important to add that there are scanty or virtually no available literatures exclusively on the topic as a basic theme. Hence, there is no one text dealing exclusively with the subject of this study.
As a result of the above, apart from the Evidence Act, the Children and Young Persons Act whose provisions will be useful in defining who a child is, worthy of reference is also the Criminal Procedure Act other materials to be appraised include the works on law of evidence of learned authors like Aguda on Law relating to evidence in Nigeria, Christopher Allen’s Practical Guide to Evidence, Richard May on Criminal Evidence, Peter Murphy Murphy on Evidence, Edward Phillips Brief Case On Law Of
Evidence, Afe Babalola’s Law and Practice of Evidence in Nigeria.
Similarly, opinions expressed in the class lectures and notes would be a subject matter of close scrutiny.
The fundamental understanding derived from the global shared values with regard to child evidence is the ultimate consideration for children interest. An example of strong precaution presented by the Convention on Rights of Children states that, “… in all actions concerning children , whether undertaken by courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.” These statutes stress that children have the right to dignity and compassion such that each child’s special needs, interests and privacy should be respected and protected. In addition, children have the right to be protected from discrimination and to be treated fairly and equally irrespective of gender, race, ethnicity, language, religion, disability, property or other status.
In reference to these global benchmark, numerous organisations across the world have based legal frameworks related to child evidence be compatible with these standards. The United Nations office on drugs and crime working in partnership with International Bureau of Children Rights and UNICEF drafted a model law for justice that was constricted to matters relating to child victims and witnesses of crime. The Model Law provides that courts shall ensure that proceedings relevant to the testimony of a child victim or witness are conducted in language that is simple and comprehensible to a child. The law also requires that, in case the child witness seek assistance in the course of legal proceedings be extended free of charge.
In addition, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of a Child has been a key instrument in advancing and advocating for settling of a high bar for children rights. Citing
Articles 12 and 13 as presented in UNCRC, it requires that matters affecting a child, they should be guaranteed access information that can enable them construct and express their own thoughts. In a situation where a child (before a judicial proceeding) is able to express an opinion, they have to be assisted in expressing their opinions, and consequently the Court should reciprocate by giving any views due weight in the decision making process according to the age and maturity of the particular child. According to these statutes, children shouldn’t be seen as passive individuals but in fact be viewed as individuals with rights to express their own views on all matters affecting them.
Regionally, legal guidelines on standards for child evidence can be traced to the Child Justice in Africa convention that was convened by the African Policy Forum and Defence for Children International. The convention proposed a framework that sought to consolidate gains in the progress of Human Rights, by advocating for the adoption of African human Rights System instruments including several components such as; the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights, African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the child and the African Youth Charter. The underlying benchmark adopted by the convention was the overriding principle for supremacy of children best interest in dispensation of legal matters. In a nutshell, they recommended that states should enact legal provisions that guarantee and uphold the rights and protections accorded to child victims and witnesses with particular attention to the protection of children privacy during dispensation of legal matters.
As observed from the international practises on the subject of legal matters relating to children, the fundamental concern is the interests of the children. Similarly, in Kenya the constitution sets similar standards on the rights of children. Chapter four, on the bill of rights, Part 3, sub article 53 (2) states that, “A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child.” Furthermore the Evidence Act puts a strong emphasis for corroboration on matters related to children evidence. Article 124, of the evidence act states, “Notwithstanding the provisions of section 19 of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act (Cap. 15), where the evidence of the alleged victim is admitted in accordance with that section on behalf of the prosecution in proceedings against any person for an offence, the accused shall not be liable to be convicted on such evidence unless it is corroborated by other material evidence in support…”
Finally, it is importance to add that because of constraints of time and space, not all the various material source employed in this work are fully reviewed except those that are of direct importance to the subject matter of this work.
In conclusion, there is a presumption that everybody has the capacity or is competent to give evidence in court. This presumption is rebuttable where a person is prevented from understanding questions put to him or giving rational answers to those questions by reason of tender age or disease of the body or mind. If a judge is in the opinion that a child is capable of understanding the nature of an oath and the duty of speaking the truth, he must warn himself so as not to judge based on the uncorroborated evidence of an incompetent child.

Get Complete Materials

Send Bulk SMS @ Abiolian Get Bulk SMS
Get Final Year Project @ Project Gist International

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy